top of page

"A Buried History of Dispossession Part 1: Precolonial Realities of the Area"

  • Writer: Henry Brannan
    Henry Brannan
  • Nov 4, 2019
  • 6 min read

Updated: Feb 26, 2020

Part one of a three part series of articles for the Grinnell College Scarlet and Black. The series combines interviews and in-depth historical research to delve into the story of the native nations whose land Grinnell College is on, the College and the relationships

between the two in the past and today. It can be found here. *FEB 2020 UPDATE: The S&B website is down for maintenance and writers have not been given a date on when it will be back up. If you would like a transcript of this article or others, please email brannanh (at) grinnell (dot) edu. Thank you.* The Article (without images)

INTRO

Though frequently associated with Thanksgiving, a U.S. holiday notorious for its whitewashed depictions of history, November is also National American Indian Heritage Month. In an effort to address locally some of these national conversations about the events and realities which the U.S. is founded upon, this article, the first in a three part series, briefly outlines some of the precolonial history of this area.

In the coming weeks, part two will address how the nations who live, or have lived, here since time immemorial were dispossessed, before finally, part three looks to the nations today, and their present relationships with the College.


LAND AND OWNERSHIP

In learning what nations are or were here, for many, one helpful starting point is native-land.ca, a tool that allows users to see what nations’ land they are on. However, Lance M. Foster (Ioway), Vice Chairman of the Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska, explains that the “... map is very loose and not super accurate,” but that it is “a starting place for people to understand who was in their neighborhood.”

Foster also points out that each nation, tribe or band had core territories, shared territories and territories that were their neighbors, comparing the core territories to one’s house, shared territories to streets or sidewalks and neighbor’s territories to your neighbor’s house that can go into “...only if you knock on the door and they invite you in.” Foster also noted that these boundaries were not set in stone, but instead dynamic and that “is the difficulty in assigning” land to particular nations definitively.

Similarly, the property-based conception of ownership that the U.S. is founded on is a newer colonial creation. When Sac and Fox of the Mississippi in Iowa Historical Preservation Director Jonathan L Buffalo (Meskwaki) talks about his nation’s lands he says “Our land,” before pausing and clarifying, “not meaning in the ownership way, but our land that we live on. When we say our land, we’re not saying it in a legalistic way, but in a cultural way. That we live on this land, in this bioregion, we live in it, and we’re supposed to take care of it.”


THE BEGINNING?

Today, with the Bering Land Bridge Theory losing traction and research placing people in North America increasingly far back, popular consensus about people’s origins on the continent is increasingly unstable with a number of different theories filling the void--notably including many from indigenous nations’ own histories.


THE IOWAY

In Iowa Public Television’s “The First Farmers” it is noted that the earliest people archaeologists have found evidence of in this region are the Paleo-Indians who roamed around the region while hunting around 12,000 years ago.

8,200 years later, the transition into life styles built around agriculture and seasonal travel for hunting would be underway as William E. Whittiker notes about the Edgewater Park site in what is now Coralville, IA in chapter 39 of his book “The Archaeological Guide to Iowa”.

In Foster’s book “The Indians of Iowa,” he explains that archaeologists have found that in the Woodland Period there were a number of native groups here, including the Oneota who the Ioway along with the Otoe, Missouria and Ho-Chunk are descended from.

Further expanding on that in an interview with the S&B, Foster explains that these Woodland cultures, located between the Ohio River on the east side, all through what is now Iowa on the west, north to the southern part of what is now Minnesota and as far south as what is now Kansas, were supported by a diverse and thriving ecosystem in the region.

However, as population density grew and groups diverged, the Ioway, drawn by new trade opportunities and buffalo “committed to the plains” of this area around 1500 CE, though Foster notes they had “begun drifting around the year 1200 or so.”

Related groups like the Mississippians lived south of here along the Mississippi River in larger, multi-ethnic metropolises, most notably, Cahokia, which the Cahokia Mounds Museum Society describes as the “... most sophisticated prehistoric native civilization north of Mexico … ” and was home to 10s of thousands of people at its peak around 1300 CE.

As evidenced by Chief No Heart of Fear’s 1837 map of Ioway ancestral villages, between the 1300s and 1600s, the Ioway were flourishing. However, Foster notes, this ended as the area was destabilized by a domino effect from conflicts like the The Beaver Wars (1629-1700) between the French aligned northern Algonquian group of nations and the Dutch and English backed Iroquois nations, and then later, the Fox Wars (1712-1735) between the Meskwaki and the French.

These wars, in the St. Lawrence River Valley area of what is now eastern Canada and the Great Lakes region, respectively, created “a great immigration of Algonquian refugees coming from the east into the midwest” who then “overtook a lot of Siouian groups” said Foster.

With some of their last villages departing what is now Iowa in search of peace in the late 1700s and early 1800s, by the time European settlers came to the area, the area was mostly inhabited by the Sauk and Meskwaki as well as Sioux groups in the north and west.


THE SAUK AND MESKWAKI

While the Sauk and Meskwaki may have been newer to what would later become Iowa, they are in fact “ancient on this continent” said Buffalo.

Buffalo notes that the nations, historically from the St. Lawrence River Valley area, slowly moved south and west, “[a]s you go east, we get older. In Wisconsin, we’re a little bit older, in Michigan we get older. And in Ohio, we’re older. And then, as you go east, we lose our separate identity and we get lost in archaeological terms… but we’re there somewhere.”

This borderline of the nations’ modern and premodern history is Michigan, which Buffalo describes as the land they lived on during parts of both periods. But he also noted that their knowledge of their history, as well as the land’s, goes beyond the colonial period explaining, “[w]e’ve been on this continent for a long time … we've seen the world change. I mean weather, you could call it climate change. And we saw the climate destroy the megafauna. Each time a change came, a new life came.”

Despite this immense span of history and the hundreds of miles between their homes throughout it, Buffalo explains that they are still within their home--just at the western edge, “[b]etween Iowa, the Great Lakes, maybe the Kentucky border, onto the east coast, all of that area is what is called a bioregion. We have lived in that region for thousands of years, and we know how to live in this environment… it doesn’t matter if we were in the Saint Lawrence River Valley or Connecticut, Ohio, Michigan, you know. We’re still within our home, our biohome.

We’re at the western end of our bioregion, but we’re still within our region. When we look outside our window, we see our gods, we see our world. You know, It’s not alien. A little bit different maybe, but it’s still basically the same. The same insects, the same weather, the same cloud, you know. So, We’re still at home, even in Iowa.”


COLONIAL EXPANSION

While European traders-soon-to-be-colonizers and the inter-nation conflicts they caused might have forced the Sauk and Meskwaki’s departure from the nations’ pre-modern lands, settlers coming to what would later become Iowa and working together with private enterprises and the U.S. government and military to take land by any means necessary marked what would necessitate another series of changes for the nations spurred by the genocidal project of European westward expansion which would eventually unite the continent in one settler colony from “sea to shining sea”.

In the next installment of this series, we will look to the specifics of how this land was taken from the nations, how the College came to be, and some of the College’s founder’s attitudes and actions towards the nations and towards the U.S. settler colonial project.


FURTHER READING

Aside from the hyperlinks you will have already come across if you’re reading this online, the following is a list of resources that may be helpful in further building your understanding of this history and its present realities. Nations’ websites:

The Sac and Fox Nation (located in Stroud, OK)

Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska (located in White Cloud, KS)

Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma (located in Perkins, OK).

The Indians of Iowa” - Lance M. Foster

“‘We Dance in Opposite Directions’: Mesquakie (Fox) Separatism from the Sac and Fox Tribe” - Michael D. Green


ree

 
 
 

Comments


No material featured on this website may be republished or used in any way without the written consent of Henry Brannan. Thank you. 

2017 - 2024

bottom of page